hondashadow1100vt
Civil/Environmental
- Dec 30, 2008
- 108
I am a PE working on a construction project. Our specifications call for all 316L stainless steel piping to be pickled and passivated. Our contractor has proposed one manufacturer that can furnish all the piping for the project, however the manufacturer uses both the pickle and passivation process as well as the bright annealing process to prepare the piping. The manufacturer claims that they cannot furnish all of the piping with only the pickled and passivated treatment. I am trying to make a fact based determination of whether or nor the bright annealing process is technically equivalent to the pickle and passivation process. The purpose of this thread is to request information/insights/feedback on the subject of these two treatments.
I am specifically thinking that a technical substantiation would include the following:
1. What is the intent of the pickle and passivation process? Is the intent of the bright annealing process the same or somewhat different?
2. How is the pickle and passivation process’s effectiveness is measured? What test is available? What data can prove it?
3. How the bright annealing process’s effectiveness is measured. What test is available? What data can prove it?
4. Relative qualitative cost difference (if any)
Thank you in advance for any feedback that you may be able to provide!
I am specifically thinking that a technical substantiation would include the following:
1. What is the intent of the pickle and passivation process? Is the intent of the bright annealing process the same or somewhat different?
2. How is the pickle and passivation process’s effectiveness is measured? What test is available? What data can prove it?
3. How the bright annealing process’s effectiveness is measured. What test is available? What data can prove it?
4. Relative qualitative cost difference (if any)
Thank you in advance for any feedback that you may be able to provide!