tumbleweed1
Electrical
- Sep 19, 2013
- 44
Before anyone says- I've already completed a search on here for info about sheath grounding. Regardless, I still have questions.
Situation: Parallel 480V generators placed 25ft away from switchgear. Some applications have ~400A/phase, some applications have 1800A or 900A/phase in parallel runs. All cable is ran with 100% spacing (up to 1.6" cable OD) in open aluminum ladder tray.
If I were to use braided bronze-armoured tray cable w/ 2kV insulation, my installation method would be to have a 1/4" thick aluminum gland plate at the generator terminal box, complete with aluminum cable gland per phase, not armoured cable connector, but like a Kellem Cord Connector/Strain Relief. On the switchgear end, for the <400A applications I would also use the same aluminum gland plate treatment. For >400A, I would use an insulating glastic material as a gland plate, still with aluminum cord connectors.
Thing is, using these strain reliefs wouldnt allow me a means of grounding the armour. So using armoured cable connectors seem best to use on one end for grounding.
Using non-armoured cable approach, first, would that even be good for the larger ampacities? I suppose at smaller ampacities <400A that may be ok, but I understand that armour helps to minimize capacitive charging current. If the insulation is rated for it, would it still provide a touch-hazard? Any other adverse effects? I dont anticipate physical damage being an issue here.
Armoured Cable: Page 3
Type of Unarmoured cables: Page 7
Situation: Parallel 480V generators placed 25ft away from switchgear. Some applications have ~400A/phase, some applications have 1800A or 900A/phase in parallel runs. All cable is ran with 100% spacing (up to 1.6" cable OD) in open aluminum ladder tray.
If I were to use braided bronze-armoured tray cable w/ 2kV insulation, my installation method would be to have a 1/4" thick aluminum gland plate at the generator terminal box, complete with aluminum cable gland per phase, not armoured cable connector, but like a Kellem Cord Connector/Strain Relief. On the switchgear end, for the <400A applications I would also use the same aluminum gland plate treatment. For >400A, I would use an insulating glastic material as a gland plate, still with aluminum cord connectors.
Thing is, using these strain reliefs wouldnt allow me a means of grounding the armour. So using armoured cable connectors seem best to use on one end for grounding.
Using non-armoured cable approach, first, would that even be good for the larger ampacities? I suppose at smaller ampacities <400A that may be ok, but I understand that armour helps to minimize capacitive charging current. If the insulation is rated for it, would it still provide a touch-hazard? Any other adverse effects? I dont anticipate physical damage being an issue here.
Armoured Cable: Page 3
Type of Unarmoured cables: Page 7