Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

480V vs. 600V systems

Status
Not open for further replies.

camfink

Electrical
May 4, 2007
8
I was wondering if there are any advantages/disadvantages to useing each of these input voltages ie) power saving, less heat, less chance of faults? Thanks
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

In theory 600 V system will be more efficient and have fewer losses. For the same kVA, smaller wire sizes can be used, voltage drop will be less of a concern. There is really not much theoretical advantage to 480 V over 600 V, since 600 V insulation is used for both.

In practice, the differences are not huge and the decision is largely driven by local custom and compatibility with existing equipment. In the US, there are not many 600 V systems, while it is much more common in Canada.

If everyone was starting over, we'd probably go with 600 V.
 
Are 600 volt systems more dangerous though when we are using these systems in hazardous areas with ignition sources. Just because your dealing with a larger voltage or does that not make a difference?
 
The main advantage of higher voltage 600V vs. 480V is lower current for the same amount of power meaning less cabling and conductors. I am currently doing a project that is utilizing 600V distribution within the facility because of the power requirements. The draw back though has been there is less equipment options for 600V than at 480V which is more common. Also depending on the loads 600V systems may require installtion of more transformers. For systems that have large connected load I would recommend using a MV distribution system (ie 5kV and up)
 
480 Volt equipent is more common and easier to get ( in most places).
IF your going to carry a good supply of spares or in an area where there are other facillities with 600 volt systems -no porblem.
 
No there is no additional danger in using 600V vs 480V in hazardous areas. Once you go over about 10V, the difference in voltage is irrelevant in terms of ignition.

Bottom line, if you are in Canada, 600V is OK because there are a lot of other 600V users there. If you are in most of the US, it will be problematic in terms of finding motors, drives, lighting fixtures etc. In fact with lighting, using a 480Y277V 4 wire system has advantages in that you can use 1 phase to neutral for much of your lighting equipment because lots of manufacturers provide 277V ballasts. With 600V, you need to buy a transformer to run your lighting systems in most cases, and transformers cost money plus drop efficiency. There are a few ballast manufacturers now selling 347V ballasts in the US, but again, limited options.
 
I have been told that the impedance and 'other' aspects make 600V systems more likely to burn via sustained low current arcs. I was then pointed to a job our company did for El Paso Gas (controlling transmission valves) where our stuff was incinerated along with everything else when a 600V arc started in a piece of equipment then burned back down 300 feet of conduit into an equipment room toasting everything within 6-8 feet of the 600V cabling. It was before my time, with that company, so I don't have personal experience with that disaster. Is there any truth to this 600V arc tenacity? It might relate to the OPs question.

Keith Cress
Flamin Systems, Inc.-
 
Wouldn't XFMRs with 600 VAC secondaries be more expensive since 480 VAC is so much more common, or is 600 VAC common enough that there is no premuim charge there?

JB
 
For hazardous areas, I guess don't see any difference and the codes make no distinction. You can blow yourself up with 50 V in the right mixture of gases.

Arcing faults could be another matter. It's an interesting question. I suspect 480 V might actually be worse for arcing faults since the 277V is right in the sweet spot for a self-sustaining arc that just keeps going and going. Both 480 V and 600 V having arcing ground fault issues that have to be dealt with. But there have been hundreds and hundreds of fires started by 480 V ground faults so I doubt that any differences are really dramatic. 600 V is used widely in the pulp and paper mills in Canada and even in the US.

 
... and a number of textile mills in the Southeast.
 
So why then do they use 480volts in Oil Fields and 600 in manufacturing industry?
 
camfink; See JBinCA's response. Oil fields are often seat-o-the-pants operations relying on local supplies for hardware. 460 is way more likely to be found on a local shelf because of the 230/460 relationship lacking with 600.

Keith Cress
Flamin Systems, Inc.-
 
Great thanks a lot for the help guys
 
Hi itsmoked.
I think that the sustained arcing issue is more an issue of improper protection rather than 480V/600V. I have seen pictures of similar damage caused by a sustained arc on 480 volts.
Such incidents are probably the driving incentive behind the NEC and CEC requirements for ground fault protection on large services and feeders. (CEC=Canadian Electrical Code for those of you in California)
respectfully
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor