the1real1Grinder
Automotive
- Aug 5, 2003
- 3
Greetings!
Should I just be happy with locally available A356?
I have just joined the forum. I was greatly surprised to find that somebody has used my real name, Grinder, for his handle. I'd rather be handleless.
I got EDS chemical analyis of a 2000 Kawaski XZ12R motorcycle engine's liquid-cooled cylinder head. This head is very similar in design and application to one of my own design that I will be having cast.
The conclusion from a friend of mine about that analysis was "dirty scrap".
(Dave does great study of car engines and motorcycle engines.)
(Dave is no metallurgist, Dave is no foundry man!)
The EDS chemical analysis: (formatted for mono-spaced type)
silicon:::: 9.1%;
ferrum::::: 0.45%;
cuprum::::: 2.5%;
mangansese: 0.17%;
magnesium:: 0.42%;
chromium::: 0.06%;
nickel::::: 0.03%;
zinc::::::: 0.88%;
titanium::: 0.03%;
plumbum:::: 0.06%;
stanum::::: 0.03%;
berylium:::<0.01%;
vanadium:::<0.01%;
zirconium:: 0.01%;
That all totals to about 13.74% to about 13.76%, depending on those "<0.01%" values.
The EDS chemical analysis specified the aluminum content as 86.3%.
(Chromium? Nickel? Stainless aluminum?)
If I cast the liquid cooled cylinder head in A356, commonly used, for example, by Edelbrock, for their mass-produced high-perfomance and racing cylinder heads for common V-8 engines, am I getting a much better material? I know mostly what I have read in my "Casting Kaiser Aluminum" book, such as A356 being specified with a maximum for other metals of 0.05% each maximum, 0.15% total maximum, and 91.88% aluminum, minimum.
Goals for the alloy include decent enough castability and decent enough machinability that the project can be finished. This for for low volume, less than 50 parts, each of about 6" X 8" X 13" after machining, maybe about 25# gross per pour.
This will be a much-cored and much-machined sand casting with no huge sections.
Goals for the casting include the usual for high-performance engine use, such as good enough hot strength, good enough non-porosity, good enough wear resistance.
Should I just be happy with locally available A356?
Thanks for any input,
Grinder Smith
Should I just be happy with locally available A356?
I have just joined the forum. I was greatly surprised to find that somebody has used my real name, Grinder, for his handle. I'd rather be handleless.
I got EDS chemical analyis of a 2000 Kawaski XZ12R motorcycle engine's liquid-cooled cylinder head. This head is very similar in design and application to one of my own design that I will be having cast.
The conclusion from a friend of mine about that analysis was "dirty scrap".
(Dave does great study of car engines and motorcycle engines.)
(Dave is no metallurgist, Dave is no foundry man!)
The EDS chemical analysis: (formatted for mono-spaced type)
silicon:::: 9.1%;
ferrum::::: 0.45%;
cuprum::::: 2.5%;
mangansese: 0.17%;
magnesium:: 0.42%;
chromium::: 0.06%;
nickel::::: 0.03%;
zinc::::::: 0.88%;
titanium::: 0.03%;
plumbum:::: 0.06%;
stanum::::: 0.03%;
berylium:::<0.01%;
vanadium:::<0.01%;
zirconium:: 0.01%;
That all totals to about 13.74% to about 13.76%, depending on those "<0.01%" values.
The EDS chemical analysis specified the aluminum content as 86.3%.
(Chromium? Nickel? Stainless aluminum?)
If I cast the liquid cooled cylinder head in A356, commonly used, for example, by Edelbrock, for their mass-produced high-perfomance and racing cylinder heads for common V-8 engines, am I getting a much better material? I know mostly what I have read in my "Casting Kaiser Aluminum" book, such as A356 being specified with a maximum for other metals of 0.05% each maximum, 0.15% total maximum, and 91.88% aluminum, minimum.
Goals for the alloy include decent enough castability and decent enough machinability that the project can be finished. This for for low volume, less than 50 parts, each of about 6" X 8" X 13" after machining, maybe about 25# gross per pour.
This will be a much-cored and much-machined sand casting with no huge sections.
Goals for the casting include the usual for high-performance engine use, such as good enough hot strength, good enough non-porosity, good enough wear resistance.
Should I just be happy with locally available A356?
Thanks for any input,
Grinder Smith