Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Abaqus - non increasing load(TF2)

Status
Not open for further replies.

SofiaB

Civil/Environmental
Jul 9, 2020
27
PT
Hello everyone!

I am analyzing an SHS steel truss, simply supported, with concentrated forces (in Newtons) applied in the top nodes. The loads are applied in reference points that are constrained, type coupling, to the section of the chord. All the top nodes have a boundary condition to prevent out-of-plane displacements. I'm using a general static analysis and a nonlinear material.

Since what I want to achieve is the force-displacement curve of each of the truss nodes to analyze the joint's behaviour, it's important to study them above the yield limit. For that, I purposefully applied a big load of 500 KN. The problem is the results for TF2 did not reach 500 KN. In fact, node 3 for example, reached 83 KN before the max number of increments and after it remained constant, not reaching the yield strength. The same happened for de U2, staying at 107 mm which obviously does not correspond to the values obtained with previous analysis in SAP 2000. Von Mises stress values are also much smaller and the deformed shape did not show any type of buckling. Can someone help me understand why Abaqus doesn't continue to increase the load??
I will leave some images for a better understatement. Thanks in advance!

Inked0_LI_m6vidu.jpg

7_kmy8s1.png

8_ueg7ay.png

image1_aswqpu.png

image2_ancvth.png

image3_fkx2mu.png

image4_msm9rk.png

image5_utbkw4.png

image6_oasfbj.png

image7_nog8e5.png
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Which type of analysis is that ? Because you've mentioned general static but images indicate Riks step. If you perform Riks analysis, you have to keep in mind that this is a specific method, it solves for displacements and loads at the same time so load magnitude is additional unknown. You may want to compare the solution obtained with Riks method with other approaches (general static or dynamic quasi-static). But this structure may simply not be able to reach higher loads in nonlinear regime.
 
I agree with with FEA way that a general stativ step is what I expected and what I would use for the kind of analysis you mention.

Therefore I would change to a general static step and see if the whole load can be applied with convergence. If some yield instability happens you will see it.

Take care when looking at the stresses in the elements, as they depend on the location (section points). For truss elemens there should be no problem though.

Andrés

annelysis GmbH | Engineering Excellence |
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top