asceduardo
Civil/Environmental
- Mar 27, 2018
- 2
I am working on a finite-element model composed by rigid bars, which are interconnected by rotational and transversal springs. Since I was having trouble with the modelling, I have decided to start with a simpler model, whose analytical solution is well known. This simpler model is represented in the figure attached. The mesh is composed by four nodes:
Point A -> Node 1
Point B -> Nodes 2 and 3 (coincident)
Point C -> Node 4
Also, the motion in X-Translation and Y-Translation of nodes 2 and 3 are constrained for being the same. For the transversal spring, I have set a grounded spring on node 3 with stiffness "kt" in Y-Translation direction. For the rotational spring, I have set a two-coincident-node spring (from node 3 to node 2), with stiffness "kr" in Z-Rotation direction. Finally, the two beam elements are set from nodes 1 to 2 and from nodes 3 to 4, respectively.
The results given coincide with the analytical results for kr = 0, showing that for some reason the rotational spring is not being properly set. Does anyone know how to solve this problem? I am using ADINA software, but help from other softwares' users is also welcome.
Thanks in advance!
Point A -> Node 1
Point B -> Nodes 2 and 3 (coincident)
Point C -> Node 4
Also, the motion in X-Translation and Y-Translation of nodes 2 and 3 are constrained for being the same. For the transversal spring, I have set a grounded spring on node 3 with stiffness "kt" in Y-Translation direction. For the rotational spring, I have set a two-coincident-node spring (from node 3 to node 2), with stiffness "kr" in Z-Rotation direction. Finally, the two beam elements are set from nodes 1 to 2 and from nodes 3 to 4, respectively.
The results given coincide with the analytical results for kr = 0, showing that for some reason the rotational spring is not being properly set. Does anyone know how to solve this problem? I am using ADINA software, but help from other softwares' users is also welcome.
Thanks in advance!