Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

ACCURACY OF STRESS CALCULATION - WHICH METHOD IS BEST?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bhat165

Structural
Apr 22, 2003
22
0
0
US
Hi,

I am doing a few coding on FEA using isoparametric continuum elements. I have read several books about the method of calculation of stress after the solution for displacement is available. My approach is: I calculate stress at the gauss points and then interpolate to the nodes using the shape functions. The final stress is the average of the stresses obtained from each element contributing to the node. Is my approach correct?

I have seen other proposed methods of stress calculation, such as using least square approximation from gauss point to nodal points, averaging over other adjacent elements etc.

My question is, what is the best method of stress calculation using isoparametric elements? Each method gives different answers to some extent. How do we make sure a software is giving correct stress? What are the methods available? Is my way of calculation correct?

Any help on this is appreciated with regard. Thanks.

Sudip
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

There is no absolute "best". They all have merit. One way to check that the stress is "correct" is to see whether the different methods converge to a similar answer (if they don't, this is very often a sign of too coarse of a mesh).

Brad
 
Brad's comments are correct....The only addition I would make is to be careful when extrapolating from gauss points to nodes....depending on how it is done it can give very bad results....

Ed.R.
 
The classic example is where the 1/4 point is used with parabolic shape functions which gives a singularity....

Ed.R.

 
The normal method is as you have stated, to average the stress at common nodes from the interpolated values. Some codes will plot the element stresses with no averaging so that you can guage the accuracy of your mesh. Element nodal stresses that give similar values at common nodes between adjacent elements will show a good mesh. If you're using linear elements then there may be a greater difference between element nodal values as the stress is constant within the element but the averaged value between elements will be more accurate. The best way to test is to compare results against known benchmark examples. NAFEMS used to compare codes and give examples.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top