FLR84
Structural
- Jun 2, 2021
- 17
Hi everyone,
I am designing a 22m span gantry crane shed with 6.4m bays and a crane rail support at 8m above the footings. There will be two 10 tonne cranes running next to each other.
If I model the column bases as pinned, then the footings can be regular pad footings but the size of column required to reduce the deflection at the crane rail level to under 10mm is insane. (500UB).
If I model the column bases as fixed, then the deflection limit can be achieved with reasonable sized columns, but the pad footing size required to resist the bearing due to moment (200kNm) is crazy.
I see other engineers using regular sized pad footings (~1.3m by 1.3m by 600 deep) and lighter columns than what I'm calculating even with fixed column bases.
Is my approach to this wrong? Is there a better way to model it?
Thanks everyone.
I am designing a 22m span gantry crane shed with 6.4m bays and a crane rail support at 8m above the footings. There will be two 10 tonne cranes running next to each other.
If I model the column bases as pinned, then the footings can be regular pad footings but the size of column required to reduce the deflection at the crane rail level to under 10mm is insane. (500UB).
If I model the column bases as fixed, then the deflection limit can be achieved with reasonable sized columns, but the pad footing size required to resist the bearing due to moment (200kNm) is crazy.
I see other engineers using regular sized pad footings (~1.3m by 1.3m by 600 deep) and lighter columns than what I'm calculating even with fixed column bases.
Is my approach to this wrong? Is there a better way to model it?
Thanks everyone.