tmschrader
Mechanical
- Jun 25, 2002
- 56
Hello
If b/t ratios are larger then those in the various sections of 1.9 then a appendix must be used to reduce the allowables. I have been checking older editions 7 and 9. In edition 7 the formula is on page 5-115 to 117. Does the more recent AISC appendix or any other code document Allow for increased allowables if stiffeners, return bends or grooves are used in the compression plates. I have a SSAB document that allows this but does not reference any European codes that support this.
The AISC increased allowables can be quite small for higher Yields of HSS. In this case increasing the Yield from 60 to 120KSI, only increases the allowable by 33%. As it does not account for improved properties from return bends or other types of corrugations.
Thanks for any input.
Note this thread brances off from a orginal thread where the accuracy of buckling programs was being asked about for local buckling. This question specifically addresses the AISC so I moved it here.
Ref:
If b/t ratios are larger then those in the various sections of 1.9 then a appendix must be used to reduce the allowables. I have been checking older editions 7 and 9. In edition 7 the formula is on page 5-115 to 117. Does the more recent AISC appendix or any other code document Allow for increased allowables if stiffeners, return bends or grooves are used in the compression plates. I have a SSAB document that allows this but does not reference any European codes that support this.
The AISC increased allowables can be quite small for higher Yields of HSS. In this case increasing the Yield from 60 to 120KSI, only increases the allowable by 33%. As it does not account for improved properties from return bends or other types of corrugations.
Thanks for any input.
Note this thread brances off from a orginal thread where the accuracy of buckling programs was being asked about for local buckling. This question specifically addresses the AISC so I moved it here.
Ref: