Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

API 650 Detail A - Figure F.2 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kathia Buena

Industrial
Sep 3, 2023
6
Hello,

If I´m using Detail a - Figure F.2, D=16m (52.49ft), H=12m (39.4ft), P= -0.25psi/+0.5psi, is it possible to meet 5.10.2.6 a 3)?

3) The roof is attached to the top angle with a single continuous fillet weld on the top side (only) that does not
exceed 5 mm (3/16 in.). No underside welding of roof to top angle (including seal welding) is permitted.


Per 4) The roof-to-top angle compression ring is limited to details a through e in Figure F-2, seems possible, but i have the doubt due previous paragraph 3), where it seems to indicate that only details b to e could be used, and not a.

Thanks in advance.

KB

 
 https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=258ef64b-3b08-468d-9716-0aaa0b1f8b0e&file=Detail_a)_F.2.jpg
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

While I'm certain that detail (a) is permitted I wouldn't want to build it.

The roof radius and circumference have to perfectly match the top of shell radius and circumference. Easily done on the drawing, but nearly impossible in the field. Details (b) thru (e) allow a landing area for the roof, making it much easier for the field to build correctly.
 
Geoff13, thank you very much for the recommendation, I think detail (b) would be much better.

KB
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor