human909
Structural
- Mar 19, 2018
- 2,113
It would seem that AS4600 has some pretty onerous limitiations when bolting steel sheet together. I'm considering two lapped plys of steel bolted together and the loss of capacity you get compared to say the EU code is significant.
4600 CAPACITY REDUCTION FACTORS
"Net section tension: 5.3.3
With washers— 5.3.3(a)
0.55 is a pretty significant capacity reduction on what is largely a simple connection. I'm not sure why the difference with washers but I'm sure somebody might be able to point me in the right direction.
In contrast:
EU.1993.1.3.2006 Pages 62-67
Have largely the same capacity calculation but have a reduction of 0.8!
So for the same design 0.55/0.8 you have a 69% loss of design capacity when following AS4600 compared to the EU code.
Is there anything I'm missing? Or is it just a difference in codes? [EDIT it seems the US codes have the identical reduction factor to AU, so EU seems signifacantly less conservative.)
As a deeper background I'm hoping to approve an EU designed structure for AU conditions. When you have 30% loss of capacity between the codes it can get kinda tricky!
(This research paper gets deeper into the nitty gritty of the various codes on these connections. However it doesn't get into the capacity reduction factors.
4600 CAPACITY REDUCTION FACTORS
"Net section tension: 5.3.3
With washers— 5.3.3(a)
double shear connection 0.65
single shear connection 0.55
Without washers 5.3.3(b) 0.65"0.55 is a pretty significant capacity reduction on what is largely a simple connection. I'm not sure why the difference with washers but I'm sure somebody might be able to point me in the right direction.
In contrast:
EU.1993.1.3.2006 Pages 62-67
Have largely the same capacity calculation but have a reduction of 0.8!
So for the same design 0.55/0.8 you have a 69% loss of design capacity when following AS4600 compared to the EU code.
Is there anything I'm missing? Or is it just a difference in codes? [EDIT it seems the US codes have the identical reduction factor to AU, so EU seems signifacantly less conservative.)
As a deeper background I'm hoping to approve an EU designed structure for AU conditions. When you have 30% loss of capacity between the codes it can get kinda tricky!
(This research paper gets deeper into the nitty gritty of the various codes on these connections. However it doesn't get into the capacity reduction factors.