Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

AS3600 - 8.1.6 Minimum strength requirements 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

sdz

Structural
Dec 19, 2001
555
0
16
AU
AS3600 - 8.1.6 Minimum strength requirements
8.1.6.1 General
The ultimate strength in bending (Muo) at critical sections shall be not less than (Muo)min, the
minimum required strength in bending at a critical cross-section, and is given by—
(M uo)min =1.2 [Z f´ct.f + Pe / Ag Pee]


Removing the prestressing term
(M uo)min =1.2 Z f´ct.f
Let M*=ø Mu =ø (M uo)min =1.2 ø Z f´ct.f then
for ø=0.85, M* = 1.02 Z f´ct.f ; using class N reinforcement
for ø=0.65, M* = 0.78 Z f´ct.f ; using class L reinforcement

The effect is that when designing for minimum strength the reinforcement Ductility Class has no effect.

Similarly, in the same clause;

For reinforced concrete cross-sections, this requirement shall be deemed to be satisfied for
the direction of bending being considered if tensile reinforcement (Ast) is provided such
that—
Ast ≥ [αb (D/d)2 f´ct,f/fsy )bw d . . 8.1.6.1(2)

Again the reinforcement Ductility Class has no affect.

However if the calculated design moment is even 1.001 times the minimum then there is an immediate step in the steel required.

It would appear to me much more sensible, and even easier, to set
M*min=Z f´ct,f
and then design normally including the appropriate ø value for the ductility class, in which case;
M*min=Z f´ct,f =0.85 Mu for normal ductility reinforcement, and
M*min=Z f´ct,f =0.65 Mu for normal low ductility reinforcement
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

sdz

It is an anomaly that was introduced when someone decided to allow for Class L steel using the Phi factor rather than phi * .85 for the strength reduction. I have pointed it out to them before but got nowhere.

In RAPT, we atually use the ratio of .85/.65 to account for it to get it right.


 
(M uo)min =1.2 [Z f´ct.f + Pe / Ag Pee]

I always treat that as a requirement for phi.Mu(min), or if you prefer M*min.

The 1.2 factor is an allowance for the concrete tensile strength being higher than the code f'ct, not a substitute for the bending reduction factors.

Here's what can happen if you don't:

IMG_0324_cefssk.jpg


Doug Jenkins
Interactive Design Services
 
IDS,

I have pointed that one out too. You can see how well I am listened to by the Phd's who run the committee!

Maybe the CIA should put in an official comment to the committee on it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top