UKJim
Civil/Environmental
- Mar 20, 2018
- 14
Chapter 26 defines "partially open" as the new catch-all for buildings that don't classify as enclosed, partially enclosed, or open. For purposes of internal pressure coefficient, the new partially open classification is treated the same as enclosed. This is numerically consistent with the 2010 version.
However, in chapters 27 and 28, the new partially open classification is not included as one of the classifications covered by the directional or envelope procedures. Unless I am missing something, we are left with no letter-of-the-law way to design a partially open building. Put another way, chapters 27 and 28 specifically state that their provisions apply to open, partially enclosed, and enclosed buildings. There is no mention of partially open, so technically one would have to reach the nonsense conclusion that neither 27 nor 28 can be used on a partially open building.
I believe the right approach is to treat a partially open building as enclosed with regard to the directional and envelope methods for MWFRS design, but this seems to be an enormous hole introduced to the code in 2016.
Have others noticed this?
However, in chapters 27 and 28, the new partially open classification is not included as one of the classifications covered by the directional or envelope procedures. Unless I am missing something, we are left with no letter-of-the-law way to design a partially open building. Put another way, chapters 27 and 28 specifically state that their provisions apply to open, partially enclosed, and enclosed buildings. There is no mention of partially open, so technically one would have to reach the nonsense conclusion that neither 27 nor 28 can be used on a partially open building.
I believe the right approach is to treat a partially open building as enclosed with regard to the directional and envelope methods for MWFRS design, but this seems to be an enormous hole introduced to the code in 2016.
Have others noticed this?