Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

ASME S8D1 Figure 2-4 - what applicable weld scheme?

Status
Not open for further replies.

22west

Mechanical
Oct 31, 2002
80
Hi,

I am performing a S8D1 flange calc on an existing PV cover (flange + torispherical head). I am trying to establish the most applicable flange -to-head weld scheme from Figure 2-4 - I think it is sketch (11), full pen with backchip. I attach an image of the flange weld detail from the original fab drawing. Does anyone see a more applicable figure 2-4 weld representation to assume for this calc? This flange was registered in 1959 along with a storage tank under S8D1 but the overall CRN package does not have any calcs for this cover.

Thanks,
22west

 
 https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=91f0091a-d8e9-4324-bf56-ab49f6b29037&file=Screenshot_20200523-151352_Gmail.jpg
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I can see the single bevel groove on the ID of the dished head, but I don't see the bevel groove with reinforcing fillet on the OD of the dished head.


Best regards - Al
 
22west, I'd think Sketch 11 is applicable, and that the detail meets the requirement for an integral flange.

Could kind of depend on the particular shop practice, but the weld symbol shown on the left (outside) of the joint could be interpreted to show a back-gouge that extends to a previously made inside groove weld. Followed by a groove weld, so full-penetration, and a really large fillet :)

Regards,

Mike

The problem with sloppy work is that the supply FAR EXCEEDS the demand
 
I'd agree with SnTMan that the weld symbols meet Figure 11.

Unless you have a really long straight flange on that head it would seem you'll be a Figure 1-6 Loose Type flange. The integral flange would require about 5" of straight flange (if I added up the dimensions correctly).

Good luck on your checking.
Geoff
 
Wow, we're all going to die.

Best regards - Al
 
Hi all,
I did not get these responses until now because I was monitoring my emails and not the website. It seems my "reply alert" is not working.
A note of thanks for the helpful responses. Not sure about the reason for the "all going to die" comment. . .

Cheers,
22west
.
 
The welding symbol on the OD is calling for a complete joint penetration bevel groove weld. The depth of the bevel is 1 1/4-inches, the dished head only extends into the joint an
1 1/8-inch in the area to be welded. That being the case, the bevel on the OD leaves nothing to back up the CJP bevel groove on the ID. You are going to be welding on air.
This is the joint preparation based on the dimensions I could see. Is this what you want?
Best regards - Al
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor