NickelMet
Materials
- Aug 19, 2002
- 181
Has anyone else noted a change in the quality control of these type nuts ('2H', ASMT A194) over the past couple of years?
In this ever-changing world of quality control and quality assurance, we have started digging into this topic. It all started with several field failures when the nuts were torqued down. From that, it grew into random sampling of various manufacturers' nuts that we use (over 30 different ones). And now, based on the analyses, we have found 6 manufacturers that have had consistently provided '2H' nuts that do not conform to the requirements of the specification. The failures to conform have been in chemistry, microstructure, hardness, and tensile testing.
Does anyone have any information or a similar story?
Thank you for your thoughts and replies.
~NiM
In this ever-changing world of quality control and quality assurance, we have started digging into this topic. It all started with several field failures when the nuts were torqued down. From that, it grew into random sampling of various manufacturers' nuts that we use (over 30 different ones). And now, based on the analyses, we have found 6 manufacturers that have had consistently provided '2H' nuts that do not conform to the requirements of the specification. The failures to conform have been in chemistry, microstructure, hardness, and tensile testing.
Does anyone have any information or a similar story?
Thank you for your thoughts and replies.
~NiM