jimmyhutmacher
Mechanical
Hoping the experts can clear something up for me. I think we can agree AWWA D100 is generally a more conservative design standard when compared to API 650. So I'm wondering why there's such a large difference in roof design with API 650 being more conservative. API 650 requires roofs to be designed for unbalanced snow loading while AWWA D100 does not. This leads to a significant difference in rafter count/size and compression ring size for tanks with a roof >10 deg. Thoughts?
Also, is anyone aware of the reasoning for adding the unbalanced snow loading to API 650? Was there a slew of roof failures due to unaccounted snow drifting? Are there any statistics on these failures?
There are other differences in roof design including the method to the find roof snow load and the rafter spacing equation itself, but I'm particularly curious about the difference in using balanced vs. unbalanced snow loading.
Also, is anyone aware of the reasoning for adding the unbalanced snow loading to API 650? Was there a slew of roof failures due to unaccounted snow drifting? Are there any statistics on these failures?
There are other differences in roof design including the method to the find roof snow load and the rafter spacing equation itself, but I'm particularly curious about the difference in using balanced vs. unbalanced snow loading.