Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

beam stability factors nds

Status
Not open for further replies.

scherry

Structural
Mar 20, 2003
54
NDS spec for wood construction, 2001. Section 3.3.3: 3.3.3.1, 3.3.3.2, 3.3.3.3 all give conditions where the factor CsubL can be considered to be 1.0, but if I look at section 4.4.1 it gives me some other conditions, which if satified give CsubL = 1.0. the question is if I look at 4.4.1.2 para c, isn't it in conflict with 3.3.3.3? That section seems to say that all bending members with ends blocked against rotation or lateral displacement with sheathing on the compression edge are fine with CsubL=1.0 but para c seems to say that this is not true for 2x10 and deeper (and 3x16). I have never used a 3x16 solid sawn, but I have used or seen used 2x10, 2x12, 2x14, the occasional 2x16 in older buildings. The older buildings had blocking and bridging in many cases, but did not in some cases have continuous sheathing, or had straight sheathing. Of course I realize that if I have negative moment that the compression edge is not likely to be supported throughout its length, but that is probably a different issue altogether. Thanks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor