Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

being curious of how to determine what boundary will be fixed as a constraint

Status
Not open for further replies.

S3067834

Aerospace
Oct 17, 2012
6
As I attached pictures that I have drawn myself, I want to understand a principle of how to determine what boundary will be fixed at each
structure. As shown in picture 1, there is a simple wing structure comprised of 4 ribs, 3 spars and 2 skins. And a load is applied at wingtip.
And a wing root are all fixed in translation and rotation directions. After its being statically analyzed by Nastran and extracted internal loads at each component. Here I want to use the internal load at each component to get optimized structure by sol 200 later on.
In picture 2, I import one of the spars (spar 2) and also import the relevant internal load into this spar 2.

But I am so confused of how to set the boundary condition to separated components because this is a structure jointed structurally with ribs and skins itself. So, anyone can help me understand this in order to determine correct boundary condition on each component and is there any source like books, examples or tutorials covering this????


 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

if you're trying to look at the spar in isolation, you need to remember that the spar is supported by the skins and ribs. i think you need to apply the displacements from the full model (this Might be the same as applying the interface loads) and constrain at the root (fully fixed).

mind you, you can't optimise the spar in isolation (changing the stiffness of the spar will change the internal loadpaths), so i'm not really sure why you'd do this ...

Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
 
So, I wonder that how to optimize the spar 2 in isolation. but here setting constraint is a problem. The optimization can mean thickness changes and shape changes and topology etc. what I understood, we basically analyze a full assembled model first and get the internal loads at each component after the static analysis. By using this load, I believe it conducts an optimization process for each component.

There is an example done by Radioss and Hyperworks (but I am still mixed up of setting constrains into a part in isolation)
 
 http://www.eng-tips.com/attachfile.cfm?folder=badd0985-fcc5-43aa-921f-e912bb37cc74&file=HM-9010_Free_Body_Diagram.pdf
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor