Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

bond-breaker vs tilt-wall rebar ?? 7

Status
Not open for further replies.

boffintech

Civil/Environmental
Jul 29, 2005
469
Am an inspector (not EOR) on some work on a tilt-wall project. I have not asked the EOR about this yet but will if needed. No tilt panels have been poured yet. Thirty to 40 are under construction. The contractor is using Maxi-Tilt as the bond-breaker between SOG and tilt-panels. It says right in the Dayton instructions "Do not spray on reinforcing steel." But regardless I'm apparently the only one on the project that thinks it a bad idea to spray the reinforcing steel with the bond-breaker. Do I have it all wrong?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

There is controversy about the effect on bond, as noted in this thread. But there should be no mistake that applying a "bond breaker" is considered "having material deleterious to bond." From a purely code-compliance aspect, you should never allow reinforcement to be coated with oils or factory bond breakers. This thread was discussing the real world implications.

In a thin slab, layers of unbonded bar will create shear planes that negatively affect performance.
 
If the "Tilt-up Concrete Association" tells its members not to do something, I don't see why a design engineer would allow it. After all, the organisation represents a group of contractors, who are always looking for cost-saving measures.
 
I agree, hokie. So the recommended practice is:

Always remove the reinforcement and apply bond breaker to the form slab.

BA
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor