Jbennett93
Structural
- Feb 22, 2024
- 3
I am currently designing a bottom chord bearing steel truss to pick up an existing building column. The bottom chord will sit on a stiffened angle seat and the top of the truss will be attached for stability with a angle with slots to stabilize the ends against rotation, while allowing the load to transfer properly to the bottom seat.
My question is - In the bottom chord truss seat, if I put slots in the direction of the truss (parallel to the chords), is that enough for me to neglect the axial load at the column connection? Am I overthinking this? If I were to use standard bolts, is the axial internal to the members and need not be considered? (I am envisioning standard steel joists with welded connections where the "pull-in" force is not necessarily considered.)
In my analysis model, the horizontal deflection is minimal with pin/roller-ping supports. (0.1") This would allow for the movement to be within long slots.
As mentioned, these are existing columns and I am trying to minimize the added forces. SIDE NOTE: This is a 40' truss, picking up a crane girder. If I analyze as pin-pin, axial reaction is about 70K.
I appreciate any and all feedback.
My question is - In the bottom chord truss seat, if I put slots in the direction of the truss (parallel to the chords), is that enough for me to neglect the axial load at the column connection? Am I overthinking this? If I were to use standard bolts, is the axial internal to the members and need not be considered? (I am envisioning standard steel joists with welded connections where the "pull-in" force is not necessarily considered.)
In my analysis model, the horizontal deflection is minimal with pin/roller-ping supports. (0.1") This would allow for the movement to be within long slots.
As mentioned, these are existing columns and I am trying to minimize the added forces. SIDE NOTE: This is a 40' truss, picking up a crane girder. If I analyze as pin-pin, axial reaction is about 70K.
I appreciate any and all feedback.