ramihabchi
Structural
- May 1, 2019
- 98
Hi,
as I understood from the following paragraph extracted from Bowles foundation analysis and design, that ks=12(SF)qa cannot be used to estimate differential settlements, but only can be used for design of foundation and soil pressure checking.am I right?
because an engineer I work with is saying to me that no need to check differential settlement in R.C buildings when the modulus of elasticity of the the previous formula is used, because the modeling software will take them into account.
." Since one does not often have values of Es, other approximations are useful and often quite satisfactory if the
computed deflection (directly dependent on ks) can be tolerated for any reasonable value. It
has been found that bending moments and the computed soil pressure are not very sensitive
to what is used for ks because the structural member stiffness is usually 10 or more times as great as the soil stiffness as defined by ks
. Recognizing this, the author has suggested the following for approximating ks from the allowable bearing capacity qa furnished by the geotechnical consultant:
SI: ks = 40(SF)^ kN/m3
Fps: ks = l2(S¥)qa k/ft3
as I understood from the following paragraph extracted from Bowles foundation analysis and design, that ks=12(SF)qa cannot be used to estimate differential settlements, but only can be used for design of foundation and soil pressure checking.am I right?
because an engineer I work with is saying to me that no need to check differential settlement in R.C buildings when the modulus of elasticity of the the previous formula is used, because the modeling software will take them into account.
." Since one does not often have values of Es, other approximations are useful and often quite satisfactory if the
computed deflection (directly dependent on ks) can be tolerated for any reasonable value. It
has been found that bending moments and the computed soil pressure are not very sensitive
to what is used for ks because the structural member stiffness is usually 10 or more times as great as the soil stiffness as defined by ks
. Recognizing this, the author has suggested the following for approximating ks from the allowable bearing capacity qa furnished by the geotechnical consultant:
SI: ks = 40(SF)^ kN/m3
Fps: ks = l2(S¥)qa k/ft3