Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations SSS148 on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Braced length of free-standing steel portal frame

Status
Not open for further replies.

bhiggins

Structural
Oct 15, 2016
152
Hi Guys and Gals!

I've been tasked with designing a free-standing steel portal frame. The span is 35', height is 10', and the frame will be supporting a wood cantilevered deck and roof. The frame is not braced laterally where the beam meets column, but I am assuming the beam top flange is braced by the wood deck. The wood deck is inset roughly 4'-6" from the beam end supports. In this situation, what would the bottom flange braced length be since the supports are not braced laterally? I've attached a drawing of the proposed design:

The frame is also designed for wind loads (no seismic).

STEEL_FRAME_d01x5w.png
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I would tend to use the length of the columns plus the beam. That's probably a little conservative, but for bending the question is at what point is the compression flange braced against twist of the cross-section. Under reversible lateral load both flanges are at one point or another in compression. This holds true at the beam/column interface, where there is no lateral brace. If the beam wants to twist at the column, the only thing restraining it is the weak axis flexural strength of the column. Think of it as the beam flange applying an out-of-plane point load at the top of the column.
 
Gosh, that's a good question. Honestly, I have a hard time believing that I never encountered this situation before. Maybe I did and didn't think deeply enough to recognize the issue.

You could argue that the column moment connection provides some restraint vs twisting. Personally, I think that is a weak argument. Just gut feeling, I'd include half the height of the column on either side. But, limiting it to an absolute max of 2*L_beam.

I have no objection to DCBII approach other than it "feels" too conservative to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor