BridgEI
Structural
- May 11, 2020
- 16
I'm designing a superstructure replacement, and we have a curved alignment with straight beams in the first span with the curve terminating at the center of pier 2. Although the beams have not undergone final design, I am a little hung up on how we are going to do the screed elevations. When I discussed this with my boss, he said the screed elevations are all going to be given at the same station for each beam in the span. That presents a problem for me because that means the distance between screed elevations for beams on the outside of the curve will be further apart longitudinally along the beams than the elevations on the inside of the curve. Furthermore, I don't understand how you accommodate this at the bearings on end bent 1 because you will have irregular spacings between each screed line at that location. He says it's not an issue because the screed machine will follow the alignment, and while I understand that, it makes the calculation more difficult. I guess my first question would be whether this makes sense or not, even though I assume it does based on the path of travel for the machine.
I was also wondering if anyone had ever gone through the trouble of using the horizontal curve information and the beam orientations to actually calculate (rather than measure) the offsets and positions of where the screed lines intersect each beam. Further, I wondered if anyone had gone through the trouble of also including the vertical curve information and superelevation diagram values to calculate the screed elevations? Probably this is a lot more trouble than it's worth, unless it could be used on longer, more complex bridges in the future. I would presume it would take less time to just draw the superstructure to find out since we're maintaining the substructure. I appreciate any advice and discussion on the matter.
I was also wondering if anyone had ever gone through the trouble of using the horizontal curve information and the beam orientations to actually calculate (rather than measure) the offsets and positions of where the screed lines intersect each beam. Further, I wondered if anyone had gone through the trouble of also including the vertical curve information and superelevation diagram values to calculate the screed elevations? Probably this is a lot more trouble than it's worth, unless it could be used on longer, more complex bridges in the future. I would presume it would take less time to just draw the superstructure to find out since we're maintaining the substructure. I appreciate any advice and discussion on the matter.