Doezer99
Aerospace
- Mar 8, 2018
- 6
Hi,
Im hoping somebody can help me out here.
Im trying to calculate the corresponding strain cycle, using two elastic stresses
and taking into account the Neuber rule which allows calculation of plastic strains from elastic stresses
If I take a stress location that cycles from Load 1 (tensile) down to Load 2 (compressive) for a number of cycles, say 200 for example.
Lets say BOTH loads are taking the stress well into the plastic region. So the tensile ELASTIC stress is, say 50% higher than yield stress,
and the compressive elastic stress is , say 30% higher than compressive yield stress.
When I calculate the two strain ranges using the Neuber rule.
Is it then correct to add both plastic strains to to get the full strain range?
Im not so sure! That seems VERY conservative. Because when the stress relaxes after Load 1, and moves back down the elastic curve,
the strain doesnt return to zero. it returns to [Plastic Strain for Load 1] - [Plastic Strain for Load 2].
It is the difference between the two strains.
But that seems too non-conservative, if you get me. That is too far the other way...
I understand its really difficult to understand me without some graphs. I will follwo with some a.s.a.p.
thanks
Donal
Im hoping somebody can help me out here.
Im trying to calculate the corresponding strain cycle, using two elastic stresses
and taking into account the Neuber rule which allows calculation of plastic strains from elastic stresses
If I take a stress location that cycles from Load 1 (tensile) down to Load 2 (compressive) for a number of cycles, say 200 for example.
Lets say BOTH loads are taking the stress well into the plastic region. So the tensile ELASTIC stress is, say 50% higher than yield stress,
and the compressive elastic stress is , say 30% higher than compressive yield stress.
When I calculate the two strain ranges using the Neuber rule.
Is it then correct to add both plastic strains to to get the full strain range?
Im not so sure! That seems VERY conservative. Because when the stress relaxes after Load 1, and moves back down the elastic curve,
the strain doesnt return to zero. it returns to [Plastic Strain for Load 1] - [Plastic Strain for Load 2].
It is the difference between the two strains.
But that seems too non-conservative, if you get me. That is too far the other way...
I understand its really difficult to understand me without some graphs. I will follwo with some a.s.a.p.
thanks
Donal