mariolucas75
Civil/Environmental
- Sep 21, 2010
- 70
Dear All,
Carbon Equivalent (CE) number defines the weldability of the steel, the lower CE the better weldability,
Is there a table for CE for known steel grades? and if no why ?
There is a formula for calculation CE=C+(Mn/6)+((C+Mo+V)/5)+((Ni+Cu)/5)
If we take for example a 316L SS that is having following composition:
(C)<0.03%
(Mn): ≤ 2.00%
(Cr): 16.00 - 18.00%
(Mo): 2.00 - 3.00%
(Cu): ≤ 0.75%
(Ni): 10.00 - 14.00%
Considering the average values:
Gives for 316L CE≈5.11
However in for example "API 577 welding processes, inspection and metallurgy" paragraph 10.8.2. metallurgy and weldability (and other sources) it says steel with CE<0.35 have excellent weldability, steels with CE >0.5 poor weldability.
316L is considered a steel with an excellent weldability whereas its calculated CE turned out to be 5.11 ?
What do i miss ?
Carbon Equivalent (CE) number defines the weldability of the steel, the lower CE the better weldability,
Is there a table for CE for known steel grades? and if no why ?
There is a formula for calculation CE=C+(Mn/6)+((C+Mo+V)/5)+((Ni+Cu)/5)
If we take for example a 316L SS that is having following composition:
(C)<0.03%
(Mn): ≤ 2.00%
(Cr): 16.00 - 18.00%
(Mo): 2.00 - 3.00%
(Cu): ≤ 0.75%
(Ni): 10.00 - 14.00%
Considering the average values:
- Cr = 17.00%
- Mo = 2.50%
- Cu = 0.75%
- Ni = 12.00%
Gives for 316L CE≈5.11
However in for example "API 577 welding processes, inspection and metallurgy" paragraph 10.8.2. metallurgy and weldability (and other sources) it says steel with CE<0.35 have excellent weldability, steels with CE >0.5 poor weldability.
316L is considered a steel with an excellent weldability whereas its calculated CE turned out to be 5.11 ?
What do i miss ?