Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Cavitation in gas carrying media 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

MartinLe

Civil/Environmental
Oct 12, 2012
394
I'm not at all sure that I really understand the hows and whys of cavitation in gas carrying media, here's some thoughts, if I'm way off please point out.

In water, the mecahnism as far as I understand is that the pressure in the pump is locally lower than the vapor pressure, small vapor bubbles form, these collapse, this can damage the pump and the whole process looses kinetic energy.

I'm interested in biogas slurries, the relevant gases are CH4 and CO2.
CH4 is practically insoluble, so a pressure change would mean that the tiny bubbles entrained will grow and shrink, correct?

CO2 will be mostly dissolved, lower pressure will mean that small bubbles form. Bubble formation will be limited in rate because the CO2 is dilute. With a pressure rise I'd expect the CO2 to dissolve again.

Either case, while bubble forming from the entrained/dissolved gasses will in all likelyhood occur at lower temp/high pressure than cavitation in pure water. In my mental image of gas bubbles collapsing there's somehow no shockwaves (like in vapor bubbles): CH4 bubbles don't vanish, they just shrink, CO2 dissolvesbut the kinetics is different and I somehow would expect these bubbles to collapse slower. I'd expect no damage to the impeller purely from this. But this is very much intuition and could be very wrong.

The observations I hear from our field guys is that when a pump cavitates, you get noise and performance losses, no one mentioned damage to the impeller (But it's entirely possible ). So I don't think my mental model is totally wrong. Or is it?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

It would agree with bimr, I would be looking at the product as it enters the hopper, if it isn't fliudised sufficiently to flow into the pump inlet you have a problem before even starting to pump.

It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts. (Sherlock Holmes - A Scandal in Bohemia.)
 
First of all, I need to make clear that I'm not right now trying to solve this pumping problem. Some smart folks came up with an idea on how to better handle two phase flow (that they did not publish anything on yet so I don't dare to describe it in detail). A new tool in my arsenal when trying to find the right pump system for a given application. I want to be sure I understand possible issues so I don't misapply the new tool. Simply put, if entrained gasses are a significant part of the problem, the new gadget is a good addition, if entrained gasses are a sideshow or irrelevant it's not.


As of strategies that seemed to work, to some degree:
timing pumping with mixing
using a VFD to lower pumps speed when (noticable) vibration occurs, and then adjust it upwarsd again to a value below with the vibration started. I think this is a standard procedure to control cavitation, yes?

Artisi, we can't look into the hopper, that's always flooded. We can measure flowrate, listen how noisy the pump is, take samples from the supply line and measure power consumption. What can we actually learn about the fluid conditions with these diagnisi tools.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor