IRstuff: Only having just looked into electromagnetic locks I didn't realise that there were fail-safe and fail-secure types, I see now how both exist. However, it seems that the constant electrical field option with the fail-safe system will give added ability to the magnets so that they have the power stay "locked" together, but I believe with enough magnets that (for my non-secutiry related purposes) the magnets alone will be sufficient to secure the platform.
EdStainless: I am unfamiliar with the "dot flip" signs along highways, but after a quick Duck Duck Go I get the picture. Am I correct in thinking that they employed the solenoid design where the electromagnet is wrapped with a single coil? The issue of power, size and even heat then comes into play, so let's talk specifics: lets say that the base wood piece was one metric metre in length, by half a metre width (and x height). While the slab on top was double the length at two metres, but the same width and height, and both on the horizontal plane. Strategically placed strong magnets would keep them in alignment and make it a real push to separate the two. Using a solenoid system on the base (which didn't need to move) applying a charge to flip the polarity would then free the top slab be free to move by hand with ease: e.g. offsetting the top slab by half a metre to the original position from the base, turning off the electrical current the magnets then keep the top wooden plank in place with natural forces.
If this is possible, then depending on the size of the magnets, will heat become an issue with the solenoid wrapped magnets in the base unit?