Mark911
Automotive
- Oct 10, 2005
- 10
Here’s another one for you guys. You hear all the time how an intercooler/aftercooler produces more mass flow because it increases density. I need this explained. The way I see it the Forced Induction device produces a given mass flow X at a given temperature Y. Now, pass that mass flow through a charge cooler and what do you get, the same mass at a lower temperature! Granted, the pressure will be reduced for a given mass flow and that’s always good, but the density is no different with these assumptions. Could it be that the reduction in temperature and subsequent pressure decrease produces a pressure gradient across the IC (not to be confused with pressure drop due to flow restriction) that generates additional flow through the IC which in turn reduces the pre IC pressure which in turn forces the turbos wastegate closed which THEN increases the overall mass flow up to the original wastegate setting? So it’s not the IC producing the extra flow/density, it’s the subsequent increase in turbo speed and extra mass flow. Given these assumptions one would expect a supercharger to only show the reduced air temps and pressures and no additional flow. In this case, the only benefits to HP coming from possibly less pumping work (dynamic CR) and the ability to tune a bit more aggressively than with higher air temps. That is unless one increases the boost back using a different pulley ratio. What am I missing?