julesomar
Mechanical
- Oct 16, 2007
- 7
I am trying to check some lifting lug calcs using Pressure Vessel Design Manual (by Moss) mainly. I have come across some conflicting methods / conventions when compared to other literature. The scenario is:
standard plate-type lifting lug with gusset, checking the lug-to-pad weld when lifting the vessel from the horizontal position using a spreader so that no (or neglible) bending occurs parallel to the lug.
Lest I am mistaken, there is a direct shear acting (= F/A), and longitudinal & transverse shear due to the moment. Generally, I have seen the moment arm being taken as the distance between point of lifting and the c.g. of the weld. Is this a conservative calc. since we are essentially neglecting the gusset support? Can someone breakdown the mechanics of this?
standard plate-type lifting lug with gusset, checking the lug-to-pad weld when lifting the vessel from the horizontal position using a spreader so that no (or neglible) bending occurs parallel to the lug.
Lest I am mistaken, there is a direct shear acting (= F/A), and longitudinal & transverse shear due to the moment. Generally, I have seen the moment arm being taken as the distance between point of lifting and the c.g. of the weld. Is this a conservative calc. since we are essentially neglecting the gusset support? Can someone breakdown the mechanics of this?