tipp79
Civil/Environmental
- Nov 3, 2006
- 38
I'm currently working as a process engineer on the design of a new chemical dosing sytem at a water treatment works . The chemicals to be dosed are MSP, Sodium Hypochlorite and Sodium Carbonate.
The water authority's specifications stipulate that the velocities in dosing lines should be in the range of 0.8 - 1.5 m/s and if the diluted chemical's velocity is less than this, carrier water should be utilised. Other guidance, however, recommends that carrier water is not used for sodium hypochlorite and MSP dosing. The authority have agreed in principle that carrier water need not be used for dosing hypochlorite and MSP so long as there is no negative consequence from dosing below the minimum velocity they recommend / without carrier water. The table below shows the velocites achieved using a 6mm diameter dosing line (smallest practical bore) and the diluted chemical dosing rate:
Chemical Dosing Concentration Velocity w/o Carrier Water
Min Max
(%) m/s m/s
Sodium Hypochlorite 3 0.02 0.04
Sodium Carbonate 5 0.26 0.52
MSP 25 0.01 0.03
Can anyone foresee a problem with using these rates?
Many Thanks,
James
The water authority's specifications stipulate that the velocities in dosing lines should be in the range of 0.8 - 1.5 m/s and if the diluted chemical's velocity is less than this, carrier water should be utilised. Other guidance, however, recommends that carrier water is not used for sodium hypochlorite and MSP dosing. The authority have agreed in principle that carrier water need not be used for dosing hypochlorite and MSP so long as there is no negative consequence from dosing below the minimum velocity they recommend / without carrier water. The table below shows the velocites achieved using a 6mm diameter dosing line (smallest practical bore) and the diluted chemical dosing rate:
Chemical Dosing Concentration Velocity w/o Carrier Water
Min Max
(%) m/s m/s
Sodium Hypochlorite 3 0.02 0.04
Sodium Carbonate 5 0.26 0.52
MSP 25 0.01 0.03
Can anyone foresee a problem with using these rates?
Many Thanks,
James