HarambeWasAnInsideJob
New member
- Oct 6, 2016
- 11
Hey guys,
can anyone shed some light on classical laminate theory (CLT)? Let's say I have a laminate made from 3 plies: 2 outter carbon fiber plies and 1 inner fiber glass ply...
I go through the Q, Q bar, and ABD matrices steps... Now, lets say i have my inverse ABD matrices. this can be multiplied by the force and moments (N & M) vector to get me the strain and curvature (epsilon & k) vector... Ok, so I calculate it out and now I have my strain... I can find stress too (only per ply)...
Can any of this data get me the displacement or the young's modulus of the entire laminate?! It seems like CLT is solely for stress and strain and doesn't take into account any other important factors... Just not sure how useful it really is other than stress or strain. One might argue that you can use Hooke's law after (sigma = E*epsilon), but this is only for isotropic materials. Not orthotropic.
Let me know.
Thanks
can anyone shed some light on classical laminate theory (CLT)? Let's say I have a laminate made from 3 plies: 2 outter carbon fiber plies and 1 inner fiber glass ply...
I go through the Q, Q bar, and ABD matrices steps... Now, lets say i have my inverse ABD matrices. this can be multiplied by the force and moments (N & M) vector to get me the strain and curvature (epsilon & k) vector... Ok, so I calculate it out and now I have my strain... I can find stress too (only per ply)...
Can any of this data get me the displacement or the young's modulus of the entire laminate?! It seems like CLT is solely for stress and strain and doesn't take into account any other important factors... Just not sure how useful it really is other than stress or strain. One might argue that you can use Hooke's law after (sigma = E*epsilon), but this is only for isotropic materials. Not orthotropic.
Let me know.
Thanks