Nor Cal SE
Structural
- Mar 7, 2017
- 84
I have a warehouse-type building, 8"-CMU reinforced and fully-grouted perimeter walls, and one location of a 12-ft door opening on the wall. I'm looking at the bending capacity of the CMU header. The total depth of CMU from the top of the parapet down to the lintel is approximately 8 feet with no interruptions. I presume there are no issues with assuming this full depth in my 'd' assumption for the CMU header's moment capacity calc. If I proceed this way, my typical 2-#5 bars at the lintel opening have more than enough capacity to resist the bending moment.
A colleague of mine wonders whether it's accurate to assume the full depth for the sake of 'd' in the moment capacity equation, thinking the beam might not act in this manner realistically, though I'm unclear why. Is there any reason to not assume the full 'd' as I'm inclined to do, whether due to ACI 530 code or best engineering practice?
A colleague of mine wonders whether it's accurate to assume the full depth for the sake of 'd' in the moment capacity equation, thinking the beam might not act in this manner realistically, though I'm unclear why. Is there any reason to not assume the full 'd' as I'm inclined to do, whether due to ACI 530 code or best engineering practice?