Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Cohesive elements do not converge when combined with ductile damage

Status
Not open for further replies.

WillingToLearn

Student
Nov 13, 2021
13
Hello,

I have a model consisting of three components: Fibre (Isotropic), Interface (Cohesive Elements) and Matrix (Ductile Damage).

If I run the model without the ductile damage, it works fine -> Interface fails
NoDuctileDamge_eiwhc0.png


If I run the model without the interface, it works fine (second picture) -> Matrix fails
NoInterface_xdfrsn.png


But when I run both together, the interface starts failing and failure is also initiated in the matrix but then it does not converge: "Time increment required is less than the minimum specified".
DuctileDamageAndInterface_orhhzs.png


I suspect that has something to do with the fact, that the matrix material starts failing at the cohesive interface.

At the point of non convergence, the dissipation energy spikes:
Static_dissipation_Energy_jwcy1m.png

XForcePeriodicBC_jv8kwi.png


Settings:

One part with different sections assigned to it

Units: Length[µm], Time [ms], Stress [GPa]

Periodic Boundary conditions

Solver: Unsymmetric (as recommended in the manual)

Minimum time step: E-25ms

Maximum time step: 10ms

NLGeom: On

Specific dissipated energy fraction: 0.0002

Max ratio of stabilization to strain energy: 0.05

Maximum degradation (matrix&interface): 0.99


I've spend many hours trying to find a solution but was not successful. I also asked in the simulia forum, but was not able to solve the issue. Do any of you have a suggestion for me?

Kind regards

Mike
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Sometimes it helps when you adjust the solver controls, especially in the case of highly nonlinear damage and fracture mechanics problems. Do you use static step here ?
 
Thank you for answering so quickly. The pictures above show a static step, but I also tried implicit dynamic and it did not change anything.

Which solver controls would you recommend to change? I have basically no experience with this.
 
You can try this:
- turn on discontinuous analysis
- increase the max number of attempts to 20

This is recommended for XFEM analyses but there’s a chance that it will help here as well.

Apart from that, enable viscous regularization in element type settings.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor