Cockroach
Mechanical
- Jan 17, 2003
- 1,104
I am drawing a 4 1/2 IF Pin and would like to show the vanishing threads. To do this, I would like to joint two helix, the first is simply the tapered path (taper=2in/ft) up to the cylinder diameter (14 thds at 0.25 in pitch). The second helix is simply a spiral which is also tapered, but at a greater rate to simulate tool pull out on a metal lathe. This is 3 threads at 15 deg taper. My problem is getting the two helix into a composite curve.
I set up a pierce plane at the end of the first helix, 14 thds X 0.25 = 3.500 inch offset. The first helix has a pitch diameter of 4.3992 inches so that the run-out after 14 thds X 0.25 in pitch would give me 4.97854 inch. That would be the start of the vanishing threads in my offset plane, the pitch diameter for the second helix. My problem is that I can't join the two helix into a composite curve. I've confirmed the start and end points are inline with eachother and the directions of either helix are identical.
The method works beautiful for a straight thread, I thought the taper thread would be simply a significant digit issue at the mating joint. But I can't get it even though measurement gives me the correct XYZ coordinates for the finish of helix 1 and start of helix 2.
There is got to be a better method. Any suggestions?
Kenneth J Hueston, PEng
Principal
Sturni-Hueston Engineering Inc
Edmonton, Alberta Canada
I set up a pierce plane at the end of the first helix, 14 thds X 0.25 = 3.500 inch offset. The first helix has a pitch diameter of 4.3992 inches so that the run-out after 14 thds X 0.25 in pitch would give me 4.97854 inch. That would be the start of the vanishing threads in my offset plane, the pitch diameter for the second helix. My problem is that I can't join the two helix into a composite curve. I've confirmed the start and end points are inline with eachother and the directions of either helix are identical.
The method works beautiful for a straight thread, I thought the taper thread would be simply a significant digit issue at the mating joint. But I can't get it even though measurement gives me the correct XYZ coordinates for the finish of helix 1 and start of helix 2.
There is got to be a better method. Any suggestions?
Kenneth J Hueston, PEng
Principal
Sturni-Hueston Engineering Inc
Edmonton, Alberta Canada