Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Composite Curves - Threads

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cockroach

Mechanical
Jan 17, 2003
1,104
I am drawing a 4 1/2 IF Pin and would like to show the vanishing threads. To do this, I would like to joint two helix, the first is simply the tapered path (taper=2in/ft) up to the cylinder diameter (14 thds at 0.25 in pitch). The second helix is simply a spiral which is also tapered, but at a greater rate to simulate tool pull out on a metal lathe. This is 3 threads at 15 deg taper. My problem is getting the two helix into a composite curve.

I set up a pierce plane at the end of the first helix, 14 thds X 0.25 = 3.500 inch offset. The first helix has a pitch diameter of 4.3992 inches so that the run-out after 14 thds X 0.25 in pitch would give me 4.97854 inch. That would be the start of the vanishing threads in my offset plane, the pitch diameter for the second helix. My problem is that I can't join the two helix into a composite curve. I've confirmed the start and end points are inline with eachother and the directions of either helix are identical.

The method works beautiful for a straight thread, I thought the taper thread would be simply a significant digit issue at the mating joint. But I can't get it even though measurement gives me the correct XYZ coordinates for the finish of helix 1 and start of helix 2.

There is got to be a better method. Any suggestions?

Kenneth J Hueston, PEng
Principal
Sturni-Hueston Engineering Inc
Edmonton, Alberta Canada
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Can you not do that in one helix using the Variable option?

Have you tried converting the helices into a 3D sketch before creating the Composite Curve?
 
I've seen the variable option in the helix command, wanted more control rather than tabularize the thread height.

I got it. The pitch diameter for the second helix was out by 0.000002 inch, it should be 2.978538 inches rather than 2.978540 inches. Probably a trucation/rounding process in the background, I thought five decimal significance was good enough.

But the methodology is correct, you can splice two helix together provided the endpoints are sufficiently close to one another. You'd think I could pick one helix and then the other and have a sub routine that would make it happen, i.e. end of one = start of two for these helix.

Maybe a program suggestion.

Kenneth J Hueston, PEng
Principal
Sturni-Hueston Engineering Inc
Edmonton, Alberta Canada
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor