Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Composite Steel Girder Force Determination 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

Quade999

Civil/Environmental
May 29, 2020
61
0
0
US
Hi Everyone,

For determining the forces in a steel girder section with a concrete deck from a modelling program under different conditions, is my interpretation below correct?

Before the deck hardens, all these forces are assumed taken by the girder only and is modelled as just the girder.
After the deck hardens, any permanent loads are calculated using the long term section (i.e. model the deck as an equivalent steel section by dividing the modulus by 3n), and when determining stresses do the same (deck is divided by 3n).
For live load, the load is calculated using the short term section (i.e. model the deck as an equivalent steel section by dividing the modulus by 1n), and when determining stresses do the same (deck is divided by 1n).

In some analysis programs it seems they will use the short term section properties of 1n to determine the forces and use the long term section properties of 3n to determine the stresses for long term loads. This doesn't seem correct with the way I've interpreted the code. I think the long term section properties of 3n need to be used to determine the forces and the use 3n properties to then determine the stresses.

See snippets below.
2_rbaqkp.png
1_yycwyw.png
3_xxzomb.png
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

You are correct in that all dead loads before the deck is hardened (DC1 loads) are taken by the noncomposite girder, but you seem to contradict/confuse yourself in your post
from there.

It’s not a hard concept:

As stated, all noncomposite dead laods (DC1) stresses use the steel section only.

The superimposed dead load(DC2 and DW) stresses are determined using the composite section properties based off of the 3n reduction in the effective slab width since they are dead loads and aren’t going anywhere (long-term).

The live load, which is a short-term load, uses the 1n reduction in the effective width.

I’ve been designing bridges for over 20 years, I have yet to find a computer program that doesn’t have errors. Good to see folks are still doing their due diligence of checking software.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top