mooseheadm5
Mechanical
Greetings,
I have been tasked with ordering some "4330" for a coating project our company is working on to restock what had been previously ordered. So far I have figured out that what the contract called for was 4330V, but what someone purchased before was listed as 4330MOD (CEVM, N&T.) I have attached a file listing the composition.
I did a bunch of searching of google and this site and learned what some of the information was. I have the Aerospace Structural Handbook open to the 4330V section (May1992 revision)open on the desk next to me.
It looks as though this fits the specs for 4330Vmod (AMS6411 and AMS6427) not just 4330mod because of the vanadium content.
Now the questions:
Did we get the right stuff to begin with? It seems like it. They list is as conforming to spec AMS6411F and 6427J (as well as all the other numbering systems it fits.) The older Aerospace Materials book has the older 6411D and 6427G compositional specs listed. From the SAE I gather that the current specs are 6411G and 6427K. It also seems from the links below that the 6411G spec has tighter controls on carbon content than 6427K (which differs from what I am seeing with the specs listed in the Aerospace Structural Materials Handbook.)
Have any of the other compositional specs changed?
Does anyone know why what we bought is listed as 4330MOD and not 4330V or Vmod?
Is the only difference between the AMS6411 and AMS6427 an allowance of higher phosphorus and sulfur content? If not, what are the differences? The UVA Engineering library (where I sit as I type this) does not have the AMS specs separately.
Thank you in advance for the assistance. I think I have close to everything I need to know, but I'd really like confirmation from someone that knows because we definitely don't want to go back and redo the coatings unnecessarily or send of coatings on the wrong substrates.
I have been tasked with ordering some "4330" for a coating project our company is working on to restock what had been previously ordered. So far I have figured out that what the contract called for was 4330V, but what someone purchased before was listed as 4330MOD (CEVM, N&T.) I have attached a file listing the composition.
I did a bunch of searching of google and this site and learned what some of the information was. I have the Aerospace Structural Handbook open to the 4330V section (May1992 revision)open on the desk next to me.
It looks as though this fits the specs for 4330Vmod (AMS6411 and AMS6427) not just 4330mod because of the vanadium content.
Now the questions:
Did we get the right stuff to begin with? It seems like it. They list is as conforming to spec AMS6411F and 6427J (as well as all the other numbering systems it fits.) The older Aerospace Materials book has the older 6411D and 6427G compositional specs listed. From the SAE I gather that the current specs are 6411G and 6427K. It also seems from the links below that the 6411G spec has tighter controls on carbon content than 6427K (which differs from what I am seeing with the specs listed in the Aerospace Structural Materials Handbook.)
Have any of the other compositional specs changed?
Does anyone know why what we bought is listed as 4330MOD and not 4330V or Vmod?
Is the only difference between the AMS6411 and AMS6427 an allowance of higher phosphorus and sulfur content? If not, what are the differences? The UVA Engineering library (where I sit as I type this) does not have the AMS specs separately.
Thank you in advance for the assistance. I think I have close to everything I need to know, but I'd really like confirmation from someone that knows because we definitely don't want to go back and redo the coatings unnecessarily or send of coatings on the wrong substrates.