Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Confusion on why 1.5 and 2 is multiplied with the bh3/12 portion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sep 28, 2021
10
Capture2_vxbilo.png
Capture_aeiso0.png
Hello guys. I did not understand why the book authors multiplied 1.5 & 2 with the moment of inertia of the rectangular portion of the beam. First one is for L shaped and second one is for an I beam. It is an example from "Design of Concrete Structures 15th edition by Arthur Nilson, Dolan & Darwin". Can anyone explain why did they do this. I calculated moment of inertial for the first one using parallel axis theorem and I got around 12000 in^4.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

they are using a rule of thumb estimate on the relative stiffness of the T/L sections compared to a rectangular section (bh^3/12), computing the actual moment of inertia as you did via parallel axis theorem will give a more accurate answer.

I'm making a thing: (It's no Kootware and it will probably break but it's alive!)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor