jd90
Mechanical
- Apr 6, 2015
- 21
Hello everyone,
I have been recently getting stuck into FEA for my work, and I am having some real difficulty classifying or categorizing the breakdown of solvers and what fits in where.
I'm hoping that someone can clarify a few things or set me straight.
So for all of our problems our choices are either an implicit or explicit analysis. Then the decision is focusing around what type of steps we will use for the model, for simplicity I am going to stick to general static and dynamic.
General Static is when the problem at hand is not dependent on time, the geometric changes aren't too drastic and inertial, damping, and other dynamic effects aren't taken into account.
The general equation we are aiming to solve is P=Ku by a direct solver inverting our stiffness matrix, Gaussian elimination is used for this when the system is linear, when non-linearity occurs does the solver switch to a Newton method?
On the other hand dynamic analysis (implicit) is solving the equation Ma+Cv+Ku=F, hence we now have mass and damping matrices to deal with. In these cases Newtons method is used rather than the Gaussian elimination as to cope with the non-linear terms that arise?
I have read that the reason Newtons method is used is to ensure the method is converging (unlike in explicit) but it must therefore be used in conjunction with something, is that correct?
I do apologize if this is all over the place but I am trying to make sense of it all.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
J
I have been recently getting stuck into FEA for my work, and I am having some real difficulty classifying or categorizing the breakdown of solvers and what fits in where.
I'm hoping that someone can clarify a few things or set me straight.
So for all of our problems our choices are either an implicit or explicit analysis. Then the decision is focusing around what type of steps we will use for the model, for simplicity I am going to stick to general static and dynamic.
General Static is when the problem at hand is not dependent on time, the geometric changes aren't too drastic and inertial, damping, and other dynamic effects aren't taken into account.
The general equation we are aiming to solve is P=Ku by a direct solver inverting our stiffness matrix, Gaussian elimination is used for this when the system is linear, when non-linearity occurs does the solver switch to a Newton method?
On the other hand dynamic analysis (implicit) is solving the equation Ma+Cv+Ku=F, hence we now have mass and damping matrices to deal with. In these cases Newtons method is used rather than the Gaussian elimination as to cope with the non-linear terms that arise?
I have read that the reason Newtons method is used is to ensure the method is converging (unlike in explicit) but it must therefore be used in conjunction with something, is that correct?
I do apologize if this is all over the place but I am trying to make sense of it all.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
J