n3jc
Civil/Environmental
- Nov 7, 2016
- 189
Hi, Im designing contraction joints for RC slab on ground.
I have never done this before but I have found and read quite a few articles about it.
What Im asking is should I make square plates 8,75 x 7,40 m (between columns) or is that way too much?
I have read they shouldnt be more than 36 d (where d is thickness of slab) so if my slab is 200 mm thick that is 7,20 m which is pretty close I guess. But if I want my slab to be thiner - lets say 150 mm, that means I can only go as far as 36 x 150/1000 = 5,40 m
Id really like to make contraction joints between columns so Id get: 8 x (8,75 x 7,40 plates)
If I choose thinner slab I have to make more cont. joints which looks way too much: 16 x (4,375 x 3,70 m)(2nd image
What is you take on this?
Thank you
I have never done this before but I have found and read quite a few articles about it.
What Im asking is should I make square plates 8,75 x 7,40 m (between columns) or is that way too much?
I have read they shouldnt be more than 36 d (where d is thickness of slab) so if my slab is 200 mm thick that is 7,20 m which is pretty close I guess. But if I want my slab to be thiner - lets say 150 mm, that means I can only go as far as 36 x 150/1000 = 5,40 m
Id really like to make contraction joints between columns so Id get: 8 x (8,75 x 7,40 plates)
If I choose thinner slab I have to make more cont. joints which looks way too much: 16 x (4,375 x 3,70 m)(2nd image
What is you take on this?
Thank you

