Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Converting topography scan (AFM/profilometry) data into 3D solid body (not surface) for FEM

Status
Not open for further replies.

SNIreaPER

Student
Jul 26, 2022
2
I have topography data (AFM scans) of a rough surface, represented as a matrix, with each element representing its height above the surface (z) and the row and column positions representing its x and y coordinates.

I can import this surface and plot it in MATLAB, but I am unable to create a 3D solid body out of it. Ideally, what I want to do is extrude the surface down to a plane, such that it looks like a elevation map with a flat base and flat sides, which I can then use for FEM analysis (in ABAQUS).

Can someone who has experience with this help me with how this can be achieved?

 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I am able to mesh it/create a surface from the point cloud data using Solidworks. However, what I want to do is create a solid 3D body (not just a surface); almost like extruding the 3D surface along a certain direction. However, Solidworks is not recognizing the surface at all, thus not allowing me to extrude it too.
 
So what does SW think the surface you have created is? I'm not an SW user. Extruding a surface to become a solid model sounds rather a straightforward operation.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376
 
Seems to me that there should be a number of ways to get there. While extruding the surface downward ought to work, there are other operations such as extruding a base upwards through the surface and using the surface to section the extruded base into two parts might be doable.

However, I'm a bit dubious that you can actually specify a surface using that complicated a point cloud, which should look something like an egg carton bottom; while the individual peaks and valleys are fairly simple, to get a closed form solution for an extended area would likely result in a fairly complex equation, which might be why the software isn't behaving. You might try and repeat the exercise with a much smaller area, say, only a couple of peaks and valleys in either direction and see if that works. If your AFM is of a uniform surface, it might be possible to simply chop out a smaller area, cover that that to a solid and then array the solid in both dimensions.

TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! faq731-376 forum1529 Entire Forum list
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor