Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Coordination and Feeders

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gringao

Electrical
Sep 25, 2010
5
0
0
US
First post here...this looks like a great forum.

Here's my situation: I have a drive/control panel whose FLA draw is 65A on the 480V line. The manufacturer has sized the main disconnect fuses at 110A. I'd like to coordinate my feeder breaker with this fusing, but I'm realizing that it will likely require a fairly large-frame breaker and upsized wire to the panel to get acceptable coordination. It seems silly to me to have a (guessing here) 250A breaker feeding a panel whose FLA is 65A. Since selectivity isn't an issue here (popping the breaker or blowing the fuses takes down the same loads, after all), I'm thinking that I may be able to keep my feeder to a reasonable size by not worrying terribly about coordination.

My question is this: When sizing protection for feeders to drive/control panels, what approach do tyou generally take?:

1) Upsize and coordinate the feeder breaker/fuses to provide coordination with the panel breaker/fuses

2) Match or slightly upsize feeder protection to panel breaker/fuses to allow for a smaller feeder.

Thanks for your help.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

If it is one breaker and one fuse feeding exactly the same load, I'd set things up so that the breaker trips before the fuse blows. Much easier to reset a breaker than a fuse.
 
I wonder why the panel disconnect is fused so high if the FLA is truly only 65A? 65 x 115% would only be 75A max. They could have used a 100 amp disconnect and fused at 80A. Maybe sized for future growth?

David Baird

Sr Controls Designer
EET degree.
Journeyman Electrician.
 
Or sized for inrush.

The fuse is for panel protection, the breaker is for cable protection. The issue looks like they wanted to be able to find the fault quickly (I don't know why, as they can't fix it quickly).

The fuse, unless it is a current limiting, should coordinate down. The breaker maybe sized such that the fast trip (inst) will not operate at those fault current levels.
 
Thanks for the replies. I don't think it's inrush they've sized for, as the panel has a large number of fractional-hp VFDs in it, plus the usual control components like a PLC, safety contactors and whatnot.

I'll try to achieve coordination with a breaker that's slower than the fuses in the panel. I really don't want to upsize my switchboard to something ridiculously large.
 
I agree with david and your comment, i would set your CB up to protect your cable and load, and not worry about co-ordination. Co-ordination is meant to help you, you wont be helped if you have to go and find fuses every time it trips!

I would definately leave the fuse there in case it is providing some fault limiting protection for the equipent in your panel.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top