bigbang
Chemical
- Dec 16, 2002
- 8
Several years ago I worked for a manager who I believed was taking financial "kickbacks" from contractors.
I had no hard evidence to prove this but was told by one of these contractors this was occurring. He told me if I ever brought this up they would deny all knowledge.
This manager was not a nice person and was very "street wise". Being a young naive engineer I would have stood no chance against his cunning so at the time decided to keep quiet and not reveal my suspicions to senior management.
I have since moved on to another company but the manager has stayed with the original company and has been promoted to a senior management position. I often think about this
situation and wonder if I took the correct course of action by keeping quiet.
I have recently found out from previous colleagues that they also had their suspicions and also decided to remain quiet.
My question is:
Did I do the correct thing by keeping quite and how would other people have reacted?
I had no hard evidence to prove this but was told by one of these contractors this was occurring. He told me if I ever brought this up they would deny all knowledge.
This manager was not a nice person and was very "street wise". Being a young naive engineer I would have stood no chance against his cunning so at the time decided to keep quiet and not reveal my suspicions to senior management.
I have since moved on to another company but the manager has stayed with the original company and has been promoted to a senior management position. I often think about this
situation and wonder if I took the correct course of action by keeping quiet.
I have recently found out from previous colleagues that they also had their suspicions and also decided to remain quiet.
My question is:
Did I do the correct thing by keeping quite and how would other people have reacted?