855
Aerospace
- Sep 24, 2002
- 3
Dear Sir/Madam,
I have a Countmeasures Computer power supply whose part number is 1874AS7200 made by Raytheon, its failure rate is 83.36. Raytheon has another proposed power supply whose part number is 1874AS7300 whose failure rate is 93.31. For the one whose part number is 1874AS7300 Raytheon used the "Brick Technology".
I need to know :
1) Why the failure rate for this one is almost 10 more than the other one.
2) Which one is better and why.
3) What is I "Brick Technology" and what is the benifit of its use.
If you have any information please let me know. If you have any fax number please let me know than I can fax some more information about those power supply. You can also contact me at saha65@mail.com.
I have a Countmeasures Computer power supply whose part number is 1874AS7200 made by Raytheon, its failure rate is 83.36. Raytheon has another proposed power supply whose part number is 1874AS7300 whose failure rate is 93.31. For the one whose part number is 1874AS7300 Raytheon used the "Brick Technology".
I need to know :
1) Why the failure rate for this one is almost 10 more than the other one.
2) Which one is better and why.
3) What is I "Brick Technology" and what is the benifit of its use.
If you have any information please let me know. If you have any fax number please let me know than I can fax some more information about those power supply. You can also contact me at saha65@mail.com.