Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

COUPLIND-TMD-IN -ABAQUS

Status
Not open for further replies.

TEIF-RO

Mechanical
Apr 1, 2019
21
Hi
I want to mount a TMD (m,k,c) on my beam-like structure in Abaqus. The beam has a mass at its top(point mass in abaqus). Practically, a tmd should be placed inside the top mass. Its seems impossible to do this as the top mass here is a point!!!
Should a TMD mass be also a point mass?
if yes how to connect spring and dashpot on it?
if not what can be the best choice?
Thanks!
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I think you would get more help if you explain what a TMD is.

Also are you interested in this part or are you interested in the beam and you just want to account only for the non structural mass of the tmd(and hence the additional weight on the beam) ?

If you could attach an image also
 
By TMD the OP means Tuned Mass Damper. Symbols in the bracket indicate mass, spring stiffness and damping coefficient respectively.

To simulate such system in Abaqus I would create a model similar to what can be seen here (typical spring-mass-damper system):

In order to do it create another point mass and connect it with spring and damper (can be found in Engineering Features container). Don't worry about the act that it's not all contained in a single point - this is how we model spring-mass-damper systems in Abaqus.
Theoretically you can do what I've listed above and then try to change the coordinates of that second point mass so that these two points will still be connected with spring and damper but they will have common coordinates. But I think it's better to leave it as it is.
 
Thank you for the clarification.
Here is a small example of a tuned mass damper (TMD). Pinned beam with first bending resonance at about 14 Hz.

The tuned damper is tuned to that frequency, thus in the frequency response when driven with a central load (arrow below), we should expect a split in that frequency due to the tmd, and a drop at the so called anti-resonance of the system (that is the freq. where the tmd is driven, and beam is almost still, just a 2 dof mass spring system).

All this can be seen in the image below. It is done in Strand7 but it is a one general approach and that can be used (other ways also to do this) - the point transnational mass of the tmd, is represented on a remote node (blue arrow marking below) that is connected via a spring-damper element (red arrow marking below) on to the central node of the beam elements. 2 DOF have been suppressed (out of plane and along beam axis at the point mass node), just to make this easier and since there is no spring stiffness horizontally, only along the spring element dir. thus axial stiffness.
This is just an example for reference but illustrates how it can be modelled, and how some FEA users might have modelled it in the past (of course damping can be adjusted so to change the response further - in this one little damping is used as seen since the peaks are quite sharp - again this is just to show how this can be modelled - since the spring element are not depended on their length it does not matter since stiffness K will be what one inputs, thus it is not element length dependent and not like EA/L like for a proper truss element where the element length is important, and comes in to the element stiffness - of course the distance might have an influence on the mass matrix (especially if it is a consistent matrix), but if the tmd mass is small compared to the structure mass, then that should be small).

Capture_juflkv.jpg
 
@ FEA way thanks for explanations!!! I did exactly what you said and it worked!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor