Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

creating an "index" command that the postprocessor will interpret

Status
Not open for further replies.

davehair

Structural
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
4
Location
US
We are currently outputting a CLSF and posting through GPM. we use a user defined event for creating an idex of operations:
Index/000 - name of index
Index/000,transl,0,0,0,0 - gives x and y coordinates and number of copies of the operations.
Now, we are moving away from generating the clsf and utilizing a postprocessor. Is there a way to create an array of operations without instancing them? Instances just clutter up the navigator and are not parametric to the initial operation. If I change my array of features, I have to delete the instanced operations and create new ones.
 
The short answer is no. Instancing the operations is the only answer I have found at the moment. We have been using sub programs and some macro-b commands at the control or multiple work offsets to eliminate the need of indexing or instances.

John Joyce
N.C. Programming Supervisor
Barnes Aerospace, Windsor CT
NX6.0.5.3
 
Thanks, we are still looking into it. If we find a solution we will pass it along.
Dave
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top