Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

CSI Bridge result output 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

tmalik3156

Structural
Jun 21, 2021
93
Good day.
My question is for those who are familiar with CSI Bridge software, and its moving load analysis output.
As shown attached, this is the tabulated output that CSI generates.
Take Frame 12 for example. This is a compression member, so I need to combine Thrust (P) and Moment (M3) to check if the member is satisfactory against buckling etc.
Rows are sorted by Max and Min for a particular station.
As can be seen, P = 2557 and M3 = 2618 are in the same row for station 0. The larger P (4550) is located further down but the corresponding M3 is low.
But are all the values in a particular row concurrent? That is, do we know that P = 2557 and M = 2618 occur at the same time? If not, what P and M3 values should I combine?


CSI_xtmqer.png
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

You have posted results of load combinations. Presumably, one row corresponds to one combination ("CaseType", "OutputCase"), but you are the engineer doing calculations, so it's up to you to verify what the tabulated results mean.

Is this a truss or pile? Why are there both axial forces and bending moments? Did you run a second-order (p-delta or actual second-order with von Karman strains) analysis?

The worst-case loading condition is found by dimensioning the structure at critical cross-sections based on the sectional forces. If you systematically input each row (load combination result) and do the design, you will eventually find the case with largest utilization ratio, i.e., the worst-case situation.
 
@ centondollar, It's an arch bridge rib. It's predominantly under compression, but with some accompanying moments.
 
No, P = 2557 and M = 2618 do not necessarily coexist. This is an envelope case, and the "max" line is showing the maximum value for each force direction. To be conservative, you should consider the largest moment together with the range of axial forces (i.e. 2557 or 4550). Create additional cases to get a more precise result, or define the cases as "corresponding" (there's a check-box for this) to get the corresponding forces under a live load case.
 
Thank you very much WJA. That was most helpful.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor