Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

DC Tools

Status
Not open for further replies.

macvicar

Automotive
May 2, 2000
33
We are currently in the process of reviewing several different brands of hand-held DC tools for an upcoming project.I'm wondering if anyone would care to share their experience with tools they are using or have used in the past. We are looking at Atlas Copco, GSE, Acradyne, George Renault, Stanley and Cooper. We are considering both transducerized and non-transducerized models.

Any input would be appreciated.

Thanks
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

For a number of our processes, we need to ensure that we achieve a specified torque on the fasteners as well as ensure that the process is completed. WIth DC, we can achieve our torque consistently and be able to inter-lock the tool to our line PLC for error-proofing. As well, DC tools are quieter that air, have less vibration and offer more flexibility in areas such as , rundown speed, angle monitoring etc. Depending on the controller, it is also possible for the tool to provide data that is useful for SPC and other quality related performance.
 
We have been using GSE tech-motive tool brand of screwdrivers (nutrunners) for years.
All of our new machines have the CS4000 contollers. All of the screwdrivers are also transducerized. The old ones have the CS50 contollers. They all have been very reliable. Their service/support is also good. All of ours are also fixtured (straight drivers) as you would probably want to use a right angle for a hand held operation. We have some Atlas Copco and Cooper but they are all pneumatic.
 
We use both Atlas Copco and Acradyne. Recently we bought five more Acradyne because for the cost of one Atlas Copco we could buy five Acradyne. Both guns work well for our process. Remanufacturing Transmissions for GM.
 
I used Atlas Copco, Cooper, Ingersoll Rand and now I am using Chicago Pneumatic and I can tell you that either Atlas Copco or Cooper will make a good choice, I just finished a Project with Cooper and I like the Interface on the Controllers, You are able to collect data thru Ethernet, It calculates CPK while you torquing and Service is excellent. I will not recommend CP tools, It has just a few capabilities, Service is not what I had in the past and the controller interface it looks awfull. Thanks
 
Stanley Assembly Technologies has really stepped up with the QPM modular DC tool line. Communications are capable through serial, Ethernet, Devicenet, profibus, and Ethernet/IP. The latest tool additions are all under 2 lbs ea. More info is available @ .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor