Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Dealing with Scaling and NORM reservoir fluids

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lcastello2025

Petroleum
Mar 8, 2023
3
Dear community.

I have been investigating in some components, that can come with reservoir fluids in oil and gas operations, which can reach the surface causing operational issues in topside installations, including scaling which will ended up in piping and equipment clogging. as an example, the Barium sulphate, as barite or formation promoted by Ba+2 + SO4-2  (in formation water dissolution), could be present together with Strontium, iron, calcium, sulfur or other components and as fluids mixed together with pressure and temperature changes will result in a kind of hard composite which is settling down little by little as scale, obstructing pipes or equipment if the sedimentation is not stopped. It can be avoided dosing descaling chemicals into the streams to keep these components in water dissolution, however, when the hard deposit is formed, it is very hard to remove, and it is a big operational issue dealing to clean and remove from the systems. Another associated issue is that this composite has an inherent radioactivity, and that is why it is classified as NORM (Normally Occurring Radioactive Material), because Barium and strontium presence. Depending on the level and kind of radiations it will represent a personnel health risk in dealing with this composite at the moment it is formed and seeking the way to remove. In an operation case was taken a sample of such composite and lab test resulted in 75 MICRO Rads/hr of radiation, I am in doubt how to interpret this result, is it high? is it harmful in human body? based on the measurements units, I know it could be expressed in 3 forms:

Emitted by a radioactive material: (Curies and Becquerels)
Amount of energy absorbed by mass of material (rad or gray)
Biological damage in human body (rem or Sieverts-depends on type of radiation).

and then using the below equivalents converted to mSV per year, the results are:

For X-rays and Gamma rays, 1 rad = 1 rem= 10 mSv.
For Neutrons, 1 rad= 5 to 20 rem (depending on energy level)= 50-200 mSV
For Alpha radiations (helium-4 nuclei), 1 rad= 20 rem=200 mSV.




If the 75 micro Rads/hr, was determined as X-ray and Gamma, the maximum value per year will be 6.57 mSv.

If the 75 micro Rads/hr, was determined as alpha radiations, then the maximum value per year will be 131.4 mSv.

 Conversion factor is used to translate the rad or gray into other units such as rem (for Radiation Equivalent Man) or Sieverts which are used to express the biological impact.

some literature says "

There are limits in allowable exposure to ionizing radiation if it is received as an occupational exposure (part of someone's job). In Europe, the limit is 20 mSv per year, and in the United States the limit is 50 mSv per year. There are no limits of radiation when used as part of medical care”

 two things:


is it correct the unit conversion as I got it?
is it a hazard for biological human body?   

Many thanks for your thoughts
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Are your conversions correct? As far as I can tell for the gamma and X-rays, yes. For the others I am not sure, as my experience is with industrial radiography using those forms of radiation. The Alpha and Beta rays are blocked by the equipment so I never had to work with the dosages.

Is it a hazard to the body? Yes. In the US radiation boundaries hazard tape signage etc. are required to be placed where the dosage is in excess of 2 mR/hr. 75 mR/hr is definitely higher than that. For removal you would need to mitigate the risk through protective measure to prevent contamination of personnel, and monitor their dosages. Ingestion and inhalation of dust is a serious concern as well as possible absorption through the skin. You probably want to hire a service contractor that specializes in NORM removal.
 
many thanks for taking time on this reply, I really appreciate your valuable and useful comments. Certainly, your safety observations will be taken into account.
 
Many years ago I was working on some formation prone to barite scale. It was scaling wells nearbore and could not be removed using usual acid treatments (HCl, mud acid) Reperforation and small skin bypass fracks were showing some success.
Continuous chemical injection would the best way to lower water scale tendency. Also watch the chemistry of other fluids pumped into theses lines for compatibility.
 
Good point YE, many of these issues are a result of mixing waters from different zones.
They are each fine alone but will cause serious scale when mixed.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor