Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Decrease the Height of Hex Nut 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

ripaldee

Mechanical
Jun 16, 2011
22
0
0
SA
During installation of a SS control valve it was found that the hex nut is in contact with the body of the control valve. This happened because an insulating gasket (i.e. dissimilar material and raw water service) is used in the flanged connection; thereby, it increased the bolt length causing the hex nut to clash with valve body. Now, is it possible to decrease the height of the hex nut (i.e. by grinding or machining, for example)? Does the industry code/standards allow this practice?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Under ASME, "if you can engineer it, you can build it" meaning that you would have to calculate the reduced strength of the flanged joint and compare it to the relief pressure, and the impulse generated when your PRV 'kicks'. At 630 psig, thrust from a PRV is not insignificant.

Also, just use a thinner insulating washer. A thick micarta washer with a steel washer on top is not your only choice. If you don't mind "hillbillying" it, cut some plastic washers from milk jugs. Verify their installation by testing for [lack of] continuity between the stud and flange.
 
"3 Threads" 'Taint so with piping flanges. Yes, the math should work out. But somebody has to do the calc's, and sign them.
 
@ Duwe6: 1.5 mm thk Micarta insulation sheet is available in the storehouse; we are using it to insulate SS piping resting on clamped shoe supports. Can we use the said insulation sheet as substitute to the thick Pikotek washers?
 
As far as I understand, industry code/standards allows up to one-thread less to consider flange bolt & nut to be fully engaged.

Thank you for all the inputs.
 
1-thread; actually no. What is allowed is 'flush at a minimum' on new work.

The 1-thread minus it the maximum underengagement allowed during an on-stream inspection. And, yes, this implies that being 1 thread short of full engagement is inconsequential.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top