IgorTC
Aerospace
- Jan 10, 2008
- 3
Hi,
For a back of the envelope type of calculation, I am trying to design a small tank that is going to need to fill as much space as possible. That space has a square cross section:
I went through this very useful paper and used the formula in:
that seems to fit with the asme code 13.
I am getting wall thicknesses for a square tank or a square tank with rounded corner that are very large compared to thicknesses I would get from a simple cylindrical tank using thin walled approximation (which is satisfied in my case).
Is this because the shear stress appears in the square or square with round corners configuration and it is not there in the cylindrical configuration ? why the large difference ?
I have read this very informative stress :
and I assume I am seeing the same difficulties somehow.
Thanks in advance,
Igor.
For a back of the envelope type of calculation, I am trying to design a small tank that is going to need to fill as much space as possible. That space has a square cross section:
I went through this very useful paper and used the formula in:
that seems to fit with the asme code 13.
I am getting wall thicknesses for a square tank or a square tank with rounded corner that are very large compared to thicknesses I would get from a simple cylindrical tank using thin walled approximation (which is satisfied in my case).
Is this because the shear stress appears in the square or square with round corners configuration and it is not there in the cylindrical configuration ? why the large difference ?
I have read this very informative stress :
and I assume I am seeing the same difficulties somehow.
Thanks in advance,
Igor.